As a doors fan, I will say that this suggestion does have some potential While yes, crowbars and axes do exist, they're both illegal to carry; Not only this, but they also give the ability of prying containers open, permanently leaving them broken. With lockpicks, though, staff could restrict...

I don't think it's possible to keep the player's momentum while the train is actively moving around. It'd take an unfathomable amount of maths to achieve this, and even so I'm pretty sure that calculating the player's position every tick to make it somewhat smooth from the player's perspective...

There's a reason why batman is a fictional character and not some guy in real life. In fiction, one doesn't have to worry about legal repercussions or the aftermath of their actions, whereas in real life, things are way.... more different. You can easily find some skits that poke fun of how...

In my opinion, combat with animals should be restricted to P2L or any other consent-based roleplay, given how animals aren't really that smart to dodge, weave or use realistic human combat techniques. If I were a bear, I'd use LOOC to state that I don't want to use a roll-based system to...

o7 I'll never forget your humongous restock requests for Sayonara

+1 If SRP uses LibsDisguises's logic, it should be possible for them to alter the scale of animals, tho it could take longer than just a few lines of code. Not a priority regardless

+1 Nothing to add here. I can imagine bobcats taking pictures of Spartans during time-out time

-1 Not really a supporter of 100% automation. Let em cook, as they say

+1 Pretty sure this just requires a permissions change if SRP uses EssentialsX's book management system. Could be wrong tho

+1 If they use the same system as back in the day, it should be a relatively easy fix (though only the Owner can actually attach events to blocks) However, given the huge backlog of bugs after the 1.21 update, this might take some time. Besides, this post will most likely be categorized as a...

As a former faction lead, I'll tell you that KPD work is actually more complicated than what you might've seen. This is why their applications are so strict, as you'll need to deal with things such as GangRP mishaps, strict monitoring and limited character possibilities when compared to normal...

Its technically pay-to-win, but not in the eyes of Mojang. For their EULA to take effect, the perks of the rank must have a competitive side to it. Imagine it like this. Buying Notable+ gives you access to all blocks in editmode for free, whereas nons would need to pay for each block. This is...

I think it's more so a matter of PR than actual EULA enforcement. Either that, or they simply doesn't wanna risk Minecraft's EULA changing out of nowhere like they've done in the past Regardless, while guns are cool and all they were very restricted. I remember they also came with a lot of...

It's quite easy to code a plugin that makes it so when a player executes the command it changes their role to a fake Adult role (in fact, the BMD role already does this. It has the same Adult prefix but it also has special permissions) However I'll admit there are dozens of more important...

What's your Minecraft Username?: YonioTheNacho What's the title of your suggestion?: Ban Appeal ETA Creation / Enforcement What's your suggestion?: PREFACE I debated writing this suggestion to avoid stirring up drama and causing rumours to spread around. However, after careful consideration...

I'll have to differ here. We're playing Minecraft, not Trove or CubeWorld. Minecraft is not a voxel game, meaning that having those complex shapes in game not only increases the resource-pack size tenfold (To exemplify it, this model went from 150 KB to less than 10 KB) but it also throws people...

It feels "better" because everyone's using it. Back in the day, when players would all have that distinguished rough shading, nobody ever complained about it being bad or annoying to look at. As a matter of fact, when this shading was introduced to SRP (fun fact, it was called "aman shading"...

I don't personally get the "false hope" counterargument you're trying to display here. Sure, the solution may not be perfect, and as I've stated before, these features are intended to discourage and put barriers that make it harder for people to spread this kind of content. Some people will...

Not sure how that would affect my suggestion 1. If you can't verify through your phone number, the discord server's staff have an option to manually verify you without one 2. The links blacklist would still apply regardless. There is no circumstance where you'd be sending that in a public...

Your response seems dismissive of what I’m trying to suggest. No measure should be unwelcome when it comes to placing barriers that hinder the efforts of doxxers or leakers. While it’s true that such measures won’t completely solve the issue (as you pointed out, it’s virtually impossible to do...